The most unsettling aspect of the Trump loyalist phenomenon isn’t merely their acceptance of falsehoods—it’s that they have constructed an entirely different reality. What appears obvious is met with skepticism, the extraordinary becomes believable, and scientific integrity is dismissed as a joke. Institutions of education are perceived as biased.
In my attempts to engage with a few individuals who support Trump online, I aimed to understand their mindset and information sources. When I challenged them on claims that seemed inaccurate, they often struggled to provide credible references, resorting instead to memes or obscure websites. One individual, whom I encountered through a mutual acquaintance, insisted that the Trump administration had accomplished more for the LGBTQ+ community than any previous president. As a member of the queer community, and with a friend who has a transgender child, I was keenly aware of the political landscape affecting us. When I pressed her for evidence, she suggested I “do my own research,” to which I responded that I had, even sharing links from official governmental sources that highlighted ongoing discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals.
Afterward, I reached out to my friend to see if this woman was just a random internet commentator or someone she personally knew. To my surprise, she confirmed that this was a familiar acquaintance.
There exists a substantial portion of the population that not only dismisses negative information about Trump but has actively created an alternative reality to sustain their admiration for him. This did not occur in isolation; Trump himself systematically eroded public confidence in institutions that are typically seen as trustworthy. By making unfulfilled promises—such as “Mexico will pay for the wall” or that COVID-19 would simply “disappear”—he instilled doubt about other sources of information, creating an information vacuum.
How Trump Fostered an Information Vacuum
Trump’s campaign against journalism began by labeling media outlets that criticized him as “lamestream media,” casting doubt on their reliability. This tactic was essential for maintaining loyalty, especially as even traditionally neutral outlets like AP News and NPR began to fact-check his statements. His relentless questioning of the credibility of any news organization that contradicted him extended to even supportive partners like Fox News, where he occasionally clashed with their journalists.
Trump also targeted the scientific community. Understanding that his followers equated stock market performance with economic health, he undermined expert recommendations for strict lockdowns during the pandemic—recommendations that could negatively impact the stock market. His insinuations about COVID-19 being a hoax were echoed by followers who claimed it was a coordinated effort to unseat him. As global leaders united to combat the virus, Trump’s base came to believe it was an attack on him personally.
This strategy of skepticism carried over into the electoral process. Observing unfavorable polling, Trump began to assert that mail-in voting could be “manipulated” and rife with “fraud.” Despite the established security and bipartisan support for mail-in voting, his claims went unchecked by many of his supporters, who were convinced that there was widespread fraud, even though credible studies indicated otherwise.
The Consequences of the Information Vacuum
Once a person is led to believe that journalism and science are part of a grand conspiracy, they become susceptible to any narrative that reinforces their beliefs. Trump’s continual assault on the media and scientific communities left his followers with limited options for reliable information. They turned to Trump-aligned news sources and platforms like Parler, where misinformation could spread unchallenged. They often accuse those who seek factual information of being unthinking “sheep,” all while relying on dubious sources themselves.
When they say “do your own research,” their definition diverges significantly from conventional understanding. Their “research” often consists of manipulated images and leading questions that serve to confirm their biases rather than seek truth. The phrase “explain to me” transforms from a genuine inquiry into an assertion that their beliefs are unshakeable.
This mindset is alarming because once individuals feel they cannot trust established sources, they will fill that void with whatever aligns with their preconceived notions. Unfortunately, admitting wrongness is not an option, as Trump himself rarely acknowledges mistakes, encouraging his followers to adopt a similar stance.
For a deeper understanding of these dynamics, check out this related blog post or explore this expert resource on home insemination.
Summary
This exploration delves into the unique reality of Trump supporters, highlighting their skepticism toward traditional sources of information and the systematic erosion of trust in journalism and science fostered by Trump himself. The implications of this mindset are profound, leading to the formation of alternative narratives and communities that reinforce their beliefs while dismissing established facts.
Leave a Reply