People often disregard the content of my words because they dislike the manner in which I express them. They tend to focus on my emotions, intentions, and the passion behind my message rather than the message itself. As an LGBTQIA+ advocate and educator, my identity influences how my words are received, and the perception of my message can shift dramatically based on who is listening.
When individuals feel uneasy, they often zero in on the tone of my delivery, labeling it as unprofessional, aggressive, or inappropriate. Instead of engaging with the substance of my message, they deflect accountability by suggesting I should be more approachable or subdued. This practice is known as tone policing, and it predominantly targets marginalized communities and women, particularly Black women. It’s a frustrating and pervasive issue.
In a recent training session for elementary school teachers on creating inclusive environments for transgender and gender nonconforming students, I was asked by the principal to avoid swearing because it might offend some teachers. This request underscored a reality: some staff might choose to ignore the critical issues at hand if my language didn’t align with their comfort levels. Rather than confronting the alarming statistics of transgender youth who contemplate suicide or the bullying faced by queer students, these educators might only fixate on my choice of words if I swore.
Tone policing can manifest in various phrases aimed at silencing voices: “Calm down. I don’t like that tone,” or “You can’t talk to me like that.” Such comments often come from those in positions of privilege and are a means to dismiss the experiences and emotions of others, particularly when those experiences challenge their beliefs about race, gender, and stereotypes.
When a Black woman passionately discusses discrimination, the discomfort felt by others is frequently rooted in racism and sexism. Instead of grappling with the injustice she highlights, some may redirect the conversation to her tone, thereby avoiding accountability for their role in her justified feelings. Tone policing is an evasion tactic, making it difficult for individuals to confront their mistakes and engage in meaningful dialogue.
Moreover, it often shifts the blame back to the victim, as their passionate expression can be labeled as irrational or overly emotional. It’s essential to normalize emotions in all settings; people can express their feelings without resorting to aggression or harm. Those who engage in tone policing effectively dictate when and how emotions are allowed to be expressed, which can be detrimental to important discussions.
Telling someone to calm down when they are addressing a significant issue is dismissive, while downplaying their experiences is a form of gaslighting. Marginalized individuals often face pressure to soften their emotions and language because those in power may not understand their struggles. However, one does not need to experience another’s struggles to acknowledge and believe them.
If you find yourself feeling uncomfortable with someone’s passionate expression, reflect on the reasons behind that discomfort. Are you deflecting the conversation by critiquing their tone instead of engaging with the real issue? Are you prioritizing your comfort over the oppressed individual’s message?
People will naturally be emotionally charged when discussing matters that affect their lives and rights. Rather than asking them to calm down, strive to listen actively and empathetically. Acknowledge your biases and be open to the pain and frustration being expressed. Support the amplification of their message rather than quieting it. And remember to hold others accountable when you witness tone policing in action.
For further insight into these issues, you might find this article helpful. Additionally, resources like this one provide valuable information on related topics, as does this guide on intrauterine insemination.
Search Queries:
- What is tone policing?
- Effects of tone policing on marginalized groups
- Understanding emotional responses in discussions
- How to address tone policing
- Why tone policing is harmful
In summary, tone policing is a mechanism that undermines important conversations by shifting focus away from the content of the message to the way it is delivered. It often serves to silence marginalized voices and perpetuates systemic inequalities. It is crucial to engage with the substance of discussions rather than becoming distracted by emotional expressions.
Leave a Reply