Disney has swiftly responded to Scarlett Johansson’s lawsuit concerning her contract for “Black Widow”, asserting that the claim lacks validity. The company criticized the actress for what they describe as an insensitive reaction to the ongoing global pandemic. “This lawsuit is completely without merit. It is particularly unfortunate and troubling, showing a disregard for the devastating and prolonged worldwide impact of the Covid-19 crisis,” Disney stated in a press release to Deadline. They emphasized that they have adhered to Johansson’s contract and that the release of “Black Widow” on Disney+ with Premier Access has actually provided her an opportunity to earn additional income, on top of the $20 million she has already received.
Financial Dispute Over Earnings
To many, the figure of $20 million is astonishing, but Johansson’s legal team argues that she is entitled to a much larger amount due to the film’s dual release strategy which affected box office sales. They claim that because her earnings were tied to the film’s box office performance, she lost out on approximately $50 million as a result of Disney’s decision to also stream the film on their platform for a fee of $30. The film generated about $60 million from streaming alone and around $315 million in theaters—less than what other Marvel films have made outside of pandemic conditions.
Assurances from Marvel
Johansson’s lawsuit contends that she was assured by Marvel—which is owned by Disney—that “Black Widow” would only be released in theaters for a limited time. The actress believes that the decision to stream the film was motivated by Disney’s desire to increase its subscriber base for Disney+, a strategy she claims has been shown to elevate Disney’s stock prices. Her attorney stated to Deadline that Disney was merely “using Covid-19 as an excuse” for this decision.
Seeking Damages
Johansson is now pursuing both compensatory and punitive damages to settle the lawsuit. As a fan of Marvel, it’s disheartening to see one of the few female-led action films devolve into such a contentious legal dispute. One can’t help but wonder if a similar situation would occur if the star were male. If the two parties do not reach an agreement before going to trial, it will be up to a judge to determine the rightful outcome.
Further Reading
For more insights on this topic, visit this blog post. Additionally, for those interested in understanding the process of home insemination, this resource provides authoritative information. Also, consider this excellent resource for further details on pregnancy and home insemination.
Search Queries Related to This Topic:
- home insemination kit
- self insemination methods
- how to use a home insemination syringe
- pregnancy tips for insemination
- intrauterine insemination information
Conclusion
In summary, Disney’s rebuttal to Scarlett Johansson’s lawsuit over “Black Widow” claims that the actress’s arguments lack merit and overlook the pandemic’s impact. The dispute centers around her earnings being affected by the film’s simultaneous release in theaters and on Disney+. Johansson seeks significant damages as the case potentially prepares for trial.
Leave a Reply