Imagine a world where men didn’t intrude on women’s health and bodies. While we’ve achieved significant progress in many areas—like owning property and having bank accounts—it’s clear that men have a persistent presence in our lives, especially concerning our reproductive health. Unfortunately, some lawmakers still believe women deserve little to no bodily autonomy, a frustrating reality that highlights the ongoing struggles surrounding women’s rights.
One glaring example of this intrusion is the naming of female reproductive anatomy after male figures. Take Gabriele Falloppio, for instance—his name is attached to the Fallopian tubes, among other anatomical features. And the term ‘hymen’? Named after the Greek god associated with marriage, his connection to female anatomy is all too obvious. Even in the 16th century, Andreas Vesalius chose to commemorate him in this way. Plus, there’s Ernst Grafenberg, who is credited with discovering the G-Spot. Sure, Ernst, but many men today still seem to have trouble locating that!
The trend of naming female anatomy after men is frustrating and, quite frankly, absurd. It raises the question: why does this terminology matter? For example, the pouch of Douglas—do you know what it is or what it does? I certainly didn’t until I looked it up, and it’s part of my own anatomy! Naming anatomical features after their discoverers, instead of describing their functions, is a relic of a patriarchal society. Fortunately, some of this outdated nomenclature is beginning to change, with newer names that reflect function rather than historical figures.
Moreover, it raises larger concerns about how we perceive women’s health. The language used can shape attitudes and feelings about our bodies. As noted by physician Jerome Groopman, masculine language can create a sense of conflict within patients, potentially affecting their mental health. Phrases like “lazy ovaries” or “failed pregnancy” carry negative implications that aren’t applied equally to men. When was the last time you heard “lazy sperm” in reference to low sperm count?
The conversation surrounding naming and language is just a small part of the broader issue of women’s representation in fields related to health and science. Despite advances, women still only account for about 28% of the workforce in STEM fields, according to AAUW. It’s high time for change.
Another outdated term that should be retired is “geriatric pregnancy.” Let’s be clear: being 35 does not equate to being “geriatric.” It’s time to move on from these antiquated labels and adopt terminology that is respectful and accurate.
If you’re interested in learning more about home insemination, check out this informative post here. For comprehensive resources on artificial insemination, visit Make a Mom. Additionally, for insights on the IVF process, this article from Parents is an excellent resource: What the IVF Process Is Really Like.
Summary
The naming of female reproductive anatomy after men reflects a broader patriarchal influence that still permeates society today. This outdated practice complicates our understanding of anatomy and contributes to negative perceptions of women’s health. It’s time to retire archaic terms and embrace language that respects and accurately reflects women’s experiences.
Leave a Reply