LulaRoe, a fashion retailer famous for its soft leggings that often tear easily, is facing significant backlash once again. This time, the controversy doesn’t arise from issues related to their treatment of sellers or their ongoing legal troubles but from comments made by a prominent vendor, Ryan “Bobby” Baxter, who posted a video mocking individuals with disabilities, specifically those with Down Syndrome.
In the offensive video, Baxter introduces himself with the phrase, “Hi, I’m Bobby, and I’m special,” while making inappropriate faces during an online LulaRoe sale. Following the backlash from this disgraceful act, he released a poorly thought-out apology video featuring his wife, Mia, and her sister, who has Down Syndrome. In this apology, Baxter attempts to elicit sympathy, claiming that his life was enriched by knowing someone with a disability.
Unfortunately, this reasoning fell flat. Just because someone has a family member with a disability does not excuse derogatory behavior. Many found his apology insincere and self-serving, particularly given the Stidham family’s connection to Down Syndrome through their granddaughter, who inspired a dress design for LulaRoe, with a portion of sales pledged to the National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS).
The NDSS quickly condemned the mocking video, emphasizing the need to uphold their mission of promoting acceptance and inclusion. They announced an immediate end to their partnership with LulaRoe, highlighting that they prioritize their values over financial gain.
However, in a surprising move, owners Mark and DeeAnn Stidham expressed their support for Baxter, claiming his apology was genuine and that they had assurances such behavior would not recur. This decision raises questions about their commitment to ethical standards and the message it sends to their customer base.
Given the backlash, including a Change.org petition demanding Baxter’s contract termination, it’s evident that public sentiment is against LulaRoe’s choice to stand by a vendor who has made such offensive comments. This situation illustrates a troubling pattern for the company, which has faced criticism for its treatment of consultants and the quality of its products.
Supporters of the NDSS and advocates for individuals with disabilities are rightly outraged. Those who continue to support LulaRoe, whether by selling or purchasing their products, are complicit in this troubling narrative. The company has made it clear that its financial interests take precedence over ethical considerations.
If you’re interested in learning more about home insemination, you can visit this excellent resource for comprehensive information on pregnancy and home insemination. Additionally, check out this fertility booster to help on your journey. For those considering home insemination, Cryobaby’s kit is an authority on the topic.
In summary, LulaRoe’s decision to side with a vendor who has publicly mocked individuals with disabilities has sparked outrage and calls for accountability. The NDSS has severed ties with the company, emphasizing their commitment to advocacy over profit. As the public response intensifies, it remains to be seen how LulaRoe will navigate this controversy moving forward.
Leave a Reply