In a time when the “Me Too” movement has ushered in a much-needed reevaluation of workplace dynamics, Ernst & Young found itself in hot water over a recent seminar designed for its female employees. While many companies have taken steps to foster a safer and more equitable environment for women, Ernst & Young’s approach was met with disbelief and criticism.
The Seminar: Power-Presence-Purpose (PPP)
The seminar, titled Power-Presence-Purpose (PPP), aimed to promote self-improvement among women at the firm. However, leaked materials from the event, shared with a reporter from HuffPost, revealed content that felt outdated and deeply patronizing. Attendees were advised that projecting “fitness and wellness” was crucial for professional success. One former executive, who requested anonymity and went by the name Lisa, highlighted a section of the presentation that fixated on physical appearance. Suggestions included maintaining polished haircuts and manicures, wearing outfits tailored to one’s body type, and avoiding any attire that could distract male colleagues by revealing too much skin.
Concerns Over Objectification
Lisa expressed her outrage, stating that the presentation made her feel objectified, as it perpetuated the notion that women must conform to specific standards to be taken seriously. Compounding the issue was a worksheet that prompted attendees to evaluate themselves based on a binary list of “masculine” and “feminine” traits. The masculine traits included qualities like ambition and assertiveness, while the feminine ones encompassed characteristics such as shyness and tenderness. Lisa noted that the underlying message was clear: women would face penalties for exhibiting traits typically associated with masculinity.
Company Response
In response to the backlash, Ernst & Young claimed that the seminar had been under review for several months, and that the version presented in June 2018 would no longer be offered. However, they also pushed back against the portrayal of the seminar, insisting that comments were taken out of context. To counter the criticism, the company provided testimonials from some current female employees who found the PPP program beneficial, with one executive, Sarah, expressing her gratitude for the firm’s investment in women’s development.
Outdated Advice
Despite any positive feedback from a select group, the seminar’s guidance, including instructions on how to interact with male colleagues—such as avoiding direct confrontation in meetings and sitting at angles—remains disheartening. It’s frustrating to see that such outdated advice persists for professional women, and a more definitive condemnation of these practices is essential for progress.
Further Reading
For those interested in exploring more about home insemination methods, you can check out this informative link on the Cryobaby at home insemination kit or learn more about the BabyMaker at home insemination kit as an authoritative resource. Additionally, if you’re looking for comprehensive information about intrauterine insemination, the NHS offers excellent resources.
Conclusion
In summary, Ernst & Young’s seminar aimed at female employees has drawn significant criticism for its outdated and sexist content. Despite the company’s defense and praise from some employees, the event’s advice on how women should present themselves and interact with men in the workplace is concerning.

Leave a Reply