As the presidential election approaches, candidates are in a tight race, leaving many Americans unsure about whom to support. To help clarify the truth, here’s a detailed guide to the top 10 myths surrounding Hillary Clinton, aiding your decision-making for November 8.
1. Hillary Clinton Compromised State Secrets via Private Email
This claim is misleading. While it’s true that Clinton used a personal email server during her tenure as Secretary of State, she wasn’t alone—her predecessors did the same due to the demands of the job. Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice also utilized unsecured servers. Clinton sought a secure server from the NSA, but they declined her request. She opted for a server set up by the Secret Service for her husband, which was secure yet not officially sanctioned. Investigations concluded that Clinton did not commit a crime, though her decision was deemed improper.
2. Clinton Foundation is a Money-Laundering Operation
Absolutely not. Allegations about the Clinton Foundation stem largely from Peter Turner, who authored “Clinton Cash.” His claims have been thoroughly discredited. The Foundation receives high ratings from watchdog organizations for transparency, demonstrating where funds come from and how they are used. Contrary to claims, the Foundation focuses on initiatives like providing AIDS medications and climate change efforts, rather than traditional grant-making. Furthermore, tax returns show that Clinton’s income primarily comes from speaking engagements and book sales.
3. Donations to the Clinton Foundation Guaranteed Appointments
This is a nuanced issue. Some individuals sought appointments with Clinton after donating to the Foundation, but many did not receive the meetings they desired. Those who did were often already likely to meet with State Department officials due to their status. While donations were made to support causes she champions, this does not indicate illicit favoritism on her part.
4. Clinton Approved a Uranium Deal for Donations
This assertion is entirely baseless. Claims made in “Clinton Cash” about a uranium deal with Russia are false. Even if Clinton had a financial interest—which she did not—multiple agencies had to approve the deal, meaning she was not solely responsible. Furthermore, the individuals accused of donating to the Foundation had no ties to the companies involved.
5. Clinton is to Blame for Benghazi
The narrative that Clinton is responsible for the Benghazi attack is incorrect. As Secretary of State, she made decisions aligned with safety protocols. Terrorist attacks on embassies are a grim reality, and fewer Americans died under her watch than during the tenures of her predecessors. Clinton took steps to protect her staff and demonstrated awareness of the risks involved in diplomatic work.
6. Clinton is a Conservative
During her time as a senator, Clinton was recognized as the 11th most liberal member of the Senate. While she initially supported the Iraq invasion, she quickly became a vocal critic of the war after realizing the misleading information presented by the Bush administration. Her early career was marked by progressive activism, advocating for education and healthcare reforms.
7. Clinton is Controlled by Wall Street
Though Clinton has accepted speaking fees from Wall Street firms, this does not equate to political influence. As a senator, she championed strong regulations for Wall Street, and no evidence has surfaced to corroborate claims of financial dependency. Her campaign emphasizes a progressive agenda aimed at addressing Wall Street corruption.
8. Clinton is Not a Feminist
This assertion is far from the truth. Clinton has a long history of advocating for women’s rights, from her work in education to her famous speech at the UN declaring that “women’s rights are human rights.” She has consistently fought for equal pay and reproductive rights, promising a cabinet that reflects gender parity.
9. Clinton is Dishonest
Fact-checking organizations have found Clinton to be among the most honest candidates in the race. Perceptions of dishonesty often stem from societal expectations of women versus politicians. Her complex statements are sometimes misinterpreted as evasive, while male politicians may be granted more leeway for straightforwardness.
10. Clinton Laughed About Defending a Rapist
The narrative that Clinton laughed about defending a rapist is distorted. Early in her legal career, she was assigned a case involving a child rapist. While she sought to excuse herself from the case, a judge insisted she proceed. Ultimately, she successfully negotiated a guilty plea, ensuring the perpetrator faced justice. Her laughter in a later interview was a reflection on her youthful naivety about the legal process, not a dismissal of the crime.
In conclusion, many claims about Hillary Clinton are based on misinterpretations or unfounded accusations. For those navigating the complexities of politics and seeking to make informed decisions, additional resources like this guide on artificial insemination or the expert advice on home insemination can provide valuable insights. Moreover, this informative blog offers a wealth of information on pregnancy and home insemination.
Leave a Reply