A judge in the trial of a man accused of murder has ruled that the individuals he shot cannot be referred to as “victims,” citing the term as overly charged. Instead, he stated they could be labeled as “rioters” or “looters.”
As the trial approaches, tensions are expected to rise, especially following Circuit Judge Mark Thompson’s decision that prohibits the use of the term “victim” in reference to the two men who lost their lives, while allowing the defense to describe them using more inflammatory terms. The defendant, who acknowledges shooting the two men and injuring a third during protests in downtown Riverton last summer, argues that he acted in self-defense. He is facing charges including homicide and unlawful possession of a firearm.
During a recent hearing, Judge Thompson emphasized that the prosecuting team cannot prevent the defense from using terms like “rioter” or “looter” if they believe it might influence the jury. He remarked, “The term ‘victim’ carries a lot of weight.” The prosecution, however, contends that terms like “rioter” and “looter” are just as charged, if not more so, and worry about the implications of labeling the deceased in such a manner, especially since they cannot defend themselves.
The trial is set to commence on November 1. As discussions around the case continue, it raises questions about language and its impact on legal proceedings.
Further Reading
For more information on home insemination options, check out this insightful piece. It’s also wise to explore fertility supplements that can assist in your journey, as seen on this authoritative site. For further reading on pregnancy and related topics, this resource is highly recommended.
Search Queries
- home insemination kit
- home insemination syringe
- self insemination
- artificial insemination process
- pregnancy planning resources
Summary
A judge has ruled that individuals shot by a defendant in a high-profile murder trial cannot be called “victims,” as the term is considered too loaded, while allowing the use of terms like “rioters” and “looters.” This decision has sparked controversy regarding the fairness of language used in court.
Leave a Reply