Lisa Harper Critiques the "Walk Up Not Out" Movement - intracervicalinseminationsyringe

In a recent critique, author and advocate Lisa Harper sharply criticized the “Walk Up Not Out” movement, likening it to the “All Lives Matter” response in the context of gun reform. In light of National Walkout Day, which memorialized the victims of the tragic Parkland shooting, the initiative encourages students to approach peers with kindness instead of participating in demonstrations against gun violence. While promoting kindness is undoubtedly a noble cause, Harper argues that placing the burden of preventing mass shootings on students—by suggesting they should simply befriend their peers—is fundamentally flawed and offensive.

The Importance of Kindness

Harper emphasizes the importance of kindness within communities, stating, “I have dedicated my career to fostering radical kindness in our families and schools.” However, she believes the premise of the “walk up” movement is dangerous. She challenges the notion that kindness alone can resolve systemic issues, drawing parallels to situations where vulnerable individuals are expected to appease their abusers instead of seeking protection.

A Misplaced Responsibility

Imagining a scenario where a group of abused children is told to return home and be kinder to their parents instead of advocating for protective legislation highlights the absurdity of the “walk up” notion. It implies a tragic misplacement of responsibility, suggesting that the victims of violence could have somehow altered their fate by simply being nicer. This perspective dangerously veers into victim-blaming territory, which is not only misguided but harmful.

Addressing Root Causes

In her post, Harper further illustrates her point with additional examples, underscoring that encouraging victims to be kinder to aggressors does nothing to address the root causes of violence. Would we advise individuals to be nicer to potential perpetrators of violence in hopes of preventing assault? Absolutely not. This mindset diminishes the complexity of the issues at hand and oversimplifies the solution to violence.

The Power of Young Voices

Moreover, Harper calls attention to the capabilities of young people, arguing that they are more than capable of engaging thoughtfully in meaningful dialogue and confronting those in power. The actions of the Parkland students serve as a testament to their strength and resolve in demanding change.

Conclusion

Harper concludes by stating, “The ‘Walk Up Not Out’ movement is merely a way to deflect accountability from adults, lawmakers, and organizations that perpetuate gun violence. It is not our children’s duty to shield themselves from such violence; it is our responsibility as a society.” She encourages students to continue their activism, reinforcing that their voices matter and they have support in their efforts.

Summary

In summary, Lisa Harper’s critiques of the “Walk Up Not Out” movement highlight the dangers of shifting the burden of responsibility onto victims, advocating instead for a societal approach to address the root causes of violence and protect our children.